Does it replace our own review?

It supports your review. Your team confirms or dismisses every flagged issue.

Do I need SiteSync PM to use it?

No. Plan Review works on its own, with its own account and billing.

Plan Review Available now AI review of your drawing set

Catch it on paper, not in the field.

Upload a PDF drawing set. Plan Review compares architectural, structural, and MEP sheets, flags discrepancies, and returns a prioritized issue report.

$499per drawing set, up to 200 pages
24 hoursto your issue report
5+actionable issues, or a full refund

Side by side
Auto-aligning
Optimizing the view
Locked

How it works

From drawing set to issue report.

Plan Review compares the sheets. Your team confirms what belongs in the report.

01Pair
02Detect
03Confirm
04Report

01 · Pair

Match sheets across disciplines.

Plan Review reads each title block and pairs architectural, structural, and MEP sheets for the same area.

Plan Review’s Pairs view: architectural sheet A106a beside structural sheet S113A, with the set’s sheet pairs listed across the top and the first two marked reviewed.

Sheet pairs: A104a with S111A and A105a with S112A, both reviewed, then A106a with S113A, selected, and A107a with S114A.

02 · Detect

See where dimensions disagree.

The AI compares each pair region by region, boxes mismatches on both sheets, and calculates the difference.

Plan Review’s AI analysis: mismatched regions boxed in red on both sheets, and five dimensional mismatches listed beside them.

Edges with discrepancy: 5. Dimensional mismatch detected: architectural 24 feet 6 and a half inches versus structural 24 feet 3 and a quarter inches. Difference: 3.25 inches, 1.10 percent.

03 · Confirm

Confirm what belongs in the report.

Architectural sheets in cyan, structural sheets in red, aligned automatically. Confirm or dismiss each flag; only confirmed issues enter the report.

The overlay at 250 percent: A106a in cyan locked over S113A in red, around units S1a, B1, and B2 ALT. — A106a · ArchitecturalS113A · StructuralLocked, deviation 0

04 · Report

Confirmed issues, ready as RFIs.

Each RFI includes both sheet numbers, dimensions, the difference, and highlighted drawings. Download the report as a PDF, or export to Excel or Procore.

The Discrepancy Analysis Report for Texas Tower: seven RFIs summarized on page one, and RFI 1 on page two with both sheets and the mismatch highlighted in red.

SiteSync ChatBot

Ask the drawings.

Ask about the set in plain English. How many doors are on A106a? Do the W1 wall tags line up with the load-bearing walls on S113A? The answers come from the sheets themselves.

SiteSync ChatBot. Asked how many doors are on the sheet, it finds 84 on A106a: 46 interior swing doors, 26 bi-fold closet doors, and 12 unit entry doors. Asked to count the W1 wall tags against S113A, it finds 47, with 45 lining up with load-bearing walls and 2 that don’t.

The spec

What it checks.

Cross-discipline checks before you bid or build.

Disciplines: Architectural, structural, and MEP. Enterprise adds civil and fire.
What it flags: Dimensional conflicts, code violations, and coordination gaps between disciplines.
What you send: The PDF drawing set. Add specs if you want code compliance checked; specs uploaded separately are free.
Issue references: Sheet references and code citations for the issues you confirm.
When to run it: At bid time, before you build, before permit, or during design coordination.

Plan Review questions.

Does it replace our own review?: It supports your review. Your team confirms or dismisses every flagged issue.
Do I need SiteSync PM to use it?: No. Plan Review works on its own, with its own account and billing.